What is the human rights data model?
The
human rights data model is a structure used to represent a single
deposition of human rights.
How is the human rights data model structured?
The human rights data model has three main components:
victim, violation, and perpetrator.
A complainant, interviewee, or
deponent gives information to a human rights organization
about
a
human rights
event. The violent events
may have happened only to the complainant or to other people. Each
person against whom one or more of the abuses were committed is
a victim.
The abuses may have occurred at one time or several
different times and at one place or several different places. Additionally,
the abuses
may have occurred in the same time and place as abuses happening
to other victims, or this victim may have been the only victim during
some or all of the events. Each violent thing happening to a single
victim is called an act or violation.
Zero, one, or many identifiable
perpetrators may have committed each act. The perpetrators may be
identifiable as individuals or organizations
and may have committed one or several acts in the complainant’s
narrative. Each victim may have suffered at the hands of the identifiable
perpetrator(s) and each perpetrator may have committed violence against
one or several victims.
What are the benefits of a human rights data model?
The
human rights data model is important as human rights violation
data is extremely complex and trying to simplify this model can lead
to distortions, which can bias the analysis. As a project collects
interviews, many deponents may describe some of the same victims,
violations, and perpetrators. The wrong way to handle this
problem
is to delete
the "redundant" or "duplicate" information.
The overlapping information contains extremely valuable statistical
information that can be used for multiple
systems estimation.
Instead of deleting the overlapping information, the
overlaps must be identified, and the organization doing the work
must make judgments
about what is truly unique and what interviews describe the same
events and violations. This process is called creating a "judgment layer" on
top of many sources, and it is described in more detail in Source
and Judgment.
|